Today we had the privilege of listening to Phil Hill’s presentation. Phil @PhilOnEdTech is an educational technology consultant and analyst who has spent the last 10 years advising in online education and educational technology markets. For me the main takeaways of his talk were that comparing traditional and online teaching is unhelpful. This slide shows that the landscape of hybrid and online learning is more complex (see slide 5 below) than an either or.
(insert photo of Phil with hands in either/or gesture)
He also discussed how questioning the integrity of online teaching has led lecturers to pay more attention to their face-to-face teaching. While some may see online education as a threat to traditional notions of Higher Education and the core missions of a university, he highlights some of the opportunities.
What I hope the PGDip students took note of was how he prioritised the need for university lecturers to think about the educational challenge they see online education being a response to. Is it about increasing accessibility for students who are unable to attend more traditional offerings, for example. Or is it around student-centred learning? Third stream income for a department? Often I meet lecturers who want to engage in online teaching but are not sure why or there is a mismatch between the problems they are facing and the online space. Sometimes there are even deeper social issues where online is not the best solution. Phil highlights the need to be purposeful which I liked because he is also questioning the rampant solutionist discourse of the edtech industry.
Listen to a podcast of his talk here.
Phil’s slides via SlideShare:
I managed to catch the first part of his talk on video: (insert here)
Also check out:
e-Literate blog (Phil is one of the contributors)